Addie, Cleveland cigar girl, 1865
In June 1865, a cigar seller at a local theater was discovered to be wearing the clothes of a woman on the body of a man. The story may have been more complicated than it looked.
[Transcriber’s notes: Jefferson Davis, leader of the just-defeated Confederacy, was arrested in May 1865 while wearing a loose overcoat and a shawl—neither necessarily female clothing. However, the image of the defeated leader attempting to elude capture disguised as a woman tickled war-weary Northerners. In the 19th century, roman punch appears to have been a drink made of lemons, rum, and cognac, served very cold. (See recipes at The Old Foodie.) Unfortunately, the Cleveland Herald for 1865 is unavailable.]
“A Young Man Detected in Female Guise—He had Successfully Appeared as a Woman for Fourteen Years—Jeff Davis Outdone.” Cleveland Herald [Cleveland, Ohio]; reprinted in Pittsburgh Daily Commercial [Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania] 27 June 1865; p. 1.
About two months ago, a young girl of pleasing looks and address came here from New York city. At first she did duty as a hotel waiter, and afterwards, through some means or other, got a situation at the Varieties, where she presided over the cigar stand. There her good looks and winning ways obtained her numerous customers, and she drove a brisk business. In many cases her fascinated patrons refused to take any change, and thus “Miss Addie”—for that was her name—throve apace in her own right, and managed to pick up any amount of pin money. Addie’s admirers, from the first, were numerous, but eventually they began to beseige her in droves, so that often the cigar stand would draw better than the stage itself. She was an accomplished coquette, and thus had a smile for each and every one of the crazy crew at her feet. Her smiles were by no means cofined to the young, for gray hairs were found worshiping at her shrine as often as the fair locks of youth. Among those who wooed her were old bachelors and Young America, and men of family, and widowers, and brainless fops, and boys whose chins had not even made the acquaintance of down. And the attentions to which she was treated were by no means confined to the wordy class. No, indeed; substantials in abundance fell to her lot, Old Mr. So-and-So gave her a new dress, and “old bach,” So-and-So presented her with several dozen pairs of pocket-handkerchiefs, and Fast Mr. So-and-So sent her two pairs of silk gaiters, and several pairs of Alexander’s best, while Master So-and-So gave her an order for a new bonnet. Then, too, scarcely a day passed that she was not taken out to ride behind a pair of fast nags, with all the usual accessories of ice-cream, strawberries and cream, Roman punch, &c.
Thus things went on—from the time of her appearance at the Varieties—in this roseate way until a few days ago, when the astounding discovery was made that “Miss Addie” was a man! Of course the manager and her crowd of admirers were both astounded, and inclined to doubt their senses; but in spite of all it turned out that she was not a woman, but that he was a man.
The young man stated that for fourteen years he had worn the garb of a woman, in which guise his fair and pleasing looks had materiality assisted him. In fact he looks as much like a woman when in male attire as when dressed in bonnet and gown. In New York he played the part of a “pretty waiter girl” at a Broadway Varieties, remaining there till waiter girls were “crushed,” when he came hither.
Since the discovery of his ruse he has gone upon the stage, and appears each evening at the Varieties, in “part first.”
“Truth is stranger than fiction.”
That Addie had been wearing women’s clothing for 14 years may be a misprint, given that Addie apparently looked very young.
In New York, Addie was one of the “pretty waiter girls” employed by “concert saloons” providing drinks and entertainment.
Which is why this story of a New York waiter girl discovered to be biologically male in April 1865 has particular interest here.
“City and Suburbs: A Pretty Waiter Girl in Trouble.” New York Dispatch [New York, New York] 9 April 1865; p. 2.
The habitues of the concert saloon No. 654 Broadway, cannot have failed to notice a pretty appearing girl, about 18 years of age, who passed under the name of Jennie Lamont. Her features were soft and pleasing, while a mild blue eye beamed pleasantly on all with whom she came in contact. A profusion of light auburn hair fell in graceful ringlets down the back of her neck and her form was such as poets often described and sculptors produced from cold inanimate marble. This, however, was a living, breathing reality. Of course, a being of this description had crowds of admirers, and invitations to supper, rides in Central Park and on the Bloomingdale Road, were so plentiful that they became an annoyance. Jewelry, too, was bestowed by lavish hands and still no one could say that he had effected a conquest, and many were the opinions expressed how a female, alone and unprotected, in such a place, and exposed to temptation should be enabled to preserve her virtue. These surmises came to a sudden ending, however, on Friday night, and in a peculiar manner. Strange as it may appear, the young lady was arrested on a charge of masquerading. The hard-hearted officer who made the arrest was bold enough to declare that she was wearing wrong apparel—that in fact this person was a he. A medical examination proved this to be the case most incontestably. Strange as it may appear, he had associated with females for many months, and his sex not suspected. His features are very feminine, his hair flows in natural ringlets down his neck, and those added to the charms of full dress, in the mysteries of which he is an adept, enabled him to carry out the deception. Yesterday he was taken before Justice Dodge of the Jefferson Market Police Court, when he stated that his real name was James Day, that he was aged 18 years, and a native of Canada, where he has several brothers and sisters. After an incarceration of some hours, the Justice concluded to allow him to go on his own recognizance, warning him, however, not to be caught in the same fix again. It is stated that several months since, while wearing the apparel of his own sex, he was arrested on suspicion of being a female. Of course those gentlemen who were so attentive to the supposed “pretty waiter girl” are laughed at by their friends, who consider it an excellent joke.
The Chicago Tribune was a lot less kind, in a letter from a correspondent dated 9 April 1865.
“New York Correspondence: Is It a Boy or a Girl?” Chicago Tribune [Chicago, Illinois] 14 April 1865; p. 3.
An interesting little affair has just been winded by the police, who, it seems, are always bringing out such cases, and mixing in, as some will say, where they have no right to intrude. For some months past a portion of the frequenters of a Broadway concert saloon have been praising the modest demeanor and exemplary habits of a pretty waiter girl of the establishment by the name of Jenny Lamont. She was handsome, had a profusion of light auburn hair which fell in natural ringlets down her graceful neck. Her features were soft and pleasing, and her mild blue eye was the perfection of the heart’s dream. She was invited to supper by the gentlemen who frequented the place, had suppers at Central Taylors, and plenty of rich presents of jewelry and fine things for her toilet table. Many were the young bucks with more money than brains who were smitten with the fair Jenny. And the other young ladies of the establishment were fast becoming jealous of her attractions, when an incident occurred which surprised every one, and none more than the aforesaid young ladies. A hard-hearted police officer came into the place last Friday night, and insisted upon arresting Jenny and taking her to the tombs. [sic] The officer insisted the girl was no girl—in fact, a masculine man. Yesterday the young lady was brought up before the Jefferson Market Police Justice Dodge, and certain physicians testified to her masculinity, and Mr. James Day was sent to jail. But after a short confinement he was released, with a warning not to do so any more. Strange as it may appear, this young man, who is eighteen years of age, and a Canadian by birth, has associated with females for many months, and escaped detection. He is an adept in female dress, and is very effeminate in stature and shape, which helped him greatly in the deception. It is stated that some months since the same young man was arrested and charged with being a woman in man’s attire. Of course the gentleman [sic] who had lavished so many attentions upon Mr. Day, do not boast of it now.
According to the Semi-Weekly Express, Lamont worked at various establishments. One thousand dollars in 1865 would have been the equivalent of $20,242 in 2024—still a good sum.
“A ‘Pretty Waiter Girl’ Who is Not a Female.” New York Semi-Weekly Express [New York, New York] 11 April 1865; p. 3.
Officer Barbalet, of the 15th Precinct, last night arrested James Day, a young Canadian, for wearing the habiliments of the other sex. For some months past the prisoner has been employed in the capacity of a waiter at various saloons on Broadway, passing for a female, so artfully was he disguised. He is rather good looking, and it is stated has engrossed the attention of many of the habitues of those places. At the time of his arrest he was engaged at No. 654 Broadway. Justice Dodge committed him for trial in default of $1,000 bail.
Was Cleveland’s Addie New York’s Jennie Lamont? The months line up pretty well, with Addie leaving New York and arriving in Cleveland in April. Who knows? (And, arrested for being a woman wearing male clothing—shades of Charles Walters!) Starting in 23 June 1865, there was a Jennie Lamont appearing in a San Francisco theater; perhaps the New York Jennie Lamont, or perhaps Addie quickly moved on.
If Addie and Jennie were the same person, Addie left New York at a good time.
Though New York City restaurants, saloons, and hotels had advertised for “waiter girls” from the 1850s, “pretty waiter girls” were such a draw that in 1860 the Gaieties Concert Saloon used the phrase with abundance in its advertisements. An advertisement in February 1860 explains that “THE YOUNG LADIES, Who attend to the wants of visiters, are another attractive feature at this establishment; their prepossessing appearance and polite and affable behavior is acknowledged by all visiters.” [advertisement. New York Herald (New York, New York) 26 February 1860; p. 7] The advertisement then spends a quarter of the page interleaving the phrase “PRETTY WAITER GIRLS” with a description of its entertainment (“PRETTY WAITER GIRLS./ E. Berry, E. Berry, E. Berry, E. Berry, E. Berry/ Unparallelled attraction at the Gaities./ PRETTY WAITER GIRLS./ Dick Watkins, Dick Watkins, Dick Watkins./ Best concert hall in the world./ PRETTY WAITER GIRLS.”), its luxuries (“This is the only place in New York/ PRETTY WAITER GIRLS./ where you can enjoy a nice sofa seat/ and see one of the best performances/ PRETTY WAITER GIRLS./ ever presented to a New York audience.”), and its price (13 cents).
And these young women were quite lively when the male customers decided to smash up the place.
“City and Suburbs: Row in a Concert Saloon.” New York Dispatch [New York, New York] 9 April 1865; p. 2.
Three roving sports, named James Robertson, James Shay and John Seymour, were charged with assaulting Frank Slavin, proprietor of the concert saloon and house of prostitution corner of Prince street and Broadway, between one and two in the morning. In the eyes of the complainant the assault was greatly aggravated by the fact that the accused were patrons of the Smithsonian. In his eyes to belong to a pretty waiter concert saloon was aristocratic compared with the Smithsonian, which was the resort of thieves, showing the philosophical truth that no matter h[o]w low we may be in morals ourselves, we can always see others beneath us in the social scale. From the evidence in the case it appears that a drunken free fight occurred, in which the pretty waiter girls made pretty good use of chairs and tumblers in the melee. When the fight commenced complainent attempted to quell the affray, when in the vernacular of the fancy he was “double banked” and floored. The Smithsonians got off with a very light fine.
How thoughtful of the Dispatch to ensure that readers knew exactly what kind of businesses Slavin was running.
As one might expect, businesses employing “pretty waiter girls” were considered low-class. So when the Louvre opened at Broadway and Fifth Avenue in June 1865, its 50 waiter girls were part of the appeal, but the proprietors were obliged to close the Fifth Avenue entrance “in order to please the residents in that immediate locality, so that the saloon cannot be viewed at all from the fashionable thoroughfare.” [“The Last Fifth Avenue Sensation—The ‘Pretty Waiter Girls’ in the Fifth Avenue.” Age (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) 13 June 1865; p. 4]
And in May 1865, the New York City council began to take action against the concert saloons, adopting “a resolution calling on the police to squelch concert saloons. What is the cause of this sudden outburst of virtue on the part of the city authorities?” asked the New York Dispatch. “Have any of the Aldermen or Councilmen been victimized by the fair Delilahs who preside over the beer barrels in these institutions?” [“Our City Fathers.” 28 May 1865; p. 2] In June, when the Gaities Concert Saloon was raided, 24 “pretty waiter girls” were among those arrested; the men were reprimanded and discharged, but the waiter girls were “committed to the Tombs for examination.” (“The Gaieties has long been considered by the police of the precinct as an exceedingly low place, the resort of thieves, abandoned women and other vile and vicious characters of both sexes,” the Herald informed its readers.) [“Police Intelligence: Captain Williamson After the Pretty Waiter Girls—Descent On a Broadway Concert Saloon—It Is a Disorderly Place.” Herald (New York, New York) 17 June 1865; p. 9]
By early 1866, the New York State Legislature was considering a bill to “totally [abolish] the pretty waiter girl nuisance.” Among other things, it required that “no concert saloon shall be allowed to exist in this State which employs girls to wait upon customers”; that “in no place where music is used in any way, shall girls be employed by the stablishment to sit among the attendants”; and that “in no drinking-saloon of any kind shall females be publicly employed.” [“The Pretty Waiter Girls,” by “Original.” World (New York, New York) 11 January 1866; p. 4]
So Addie arrived in Cleveland in good time to avoid the complete “crushing” of the pretty waiter girls and found employment in an establishment like those in New York City.
And may have moved on to find a life under another name.
previous: Ellen Acton in court, 1865
next: Jenny Clark, drummer boy, 1865
To “Nineteenth-Century American Children & What They Read”
Some of the children | Some of their books | Some of their magazines
Some works for adults, 1800-1872